Legal Opinion

State v. Booton

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1962No. 9159PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*54McFADDEN, Justice.

Appellant Booton was charged by an information of passing and uttering a forged instrument with intent to defraud, knowing it was false and forged, under the provisions of I.C. § 18-3601. He was tried and convicted of the charge, and appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for new trial.

Appellant asserts that the court erred in entering judgment of conviction, contending insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment, and particularly insufficiency, to establish: that he had passed and uttered the check knowingly, willfully…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. PeeplesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. HoblSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. State v. ParishIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  5. People v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. CypherIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. FoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. RossIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. PruettIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. StifflerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API