Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1939No. 6594PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Appellant’s first assignment of error is that the attorney general or his deputies had no legal right to be present before the grand jury during any stage of its deliberations because of the inhibitions of section 19-1011, I. C. A., unchanged, except the designation of district to prosecuting attorney, since 1,864, as follows:

“ . . . . The prosecuting attorney of the county may at all times appear before the grand jury for the purpose of giving them information or advice relative to any matter cognizable by them, and may interrogate witnesses before them whenever they or he think it…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Coblentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Stein v. MorrisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State v. McMahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Idaho, Inc. v. WasdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. State v. CottonIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Carrillo v. BOISE TIRE CO., INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Doggett v. Electronics Corp. of Am., Combust. Con. Div.Idaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. DavidsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API