State ex rel. Crookston Lumber Co. v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon the relation of the Crookston Lumber Company this court granted its writ of certiorari directed to the district court for Pennington county and Honorable Andrew Grindeland, one of the judges thereof, to review the judgment in an action in that court under the Workmen’s Compensation Act brought by Lewis Svendsgaard against relator to recover compensation for his injuries while in the employ of relator.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, brought to this court on certiorari after judgment against the employer, relator herein.
The only question presented is whether the findings of the trial court in the respects challenged by the assignments of error are sustained by the evidence.
It appears that relator, the employer, is a corporation and at the time in question was engaged in lumbering operations in woods of northern Minnesota. Claimant was in its employ and while engaged in the line of his work received the injury for which he claims compensation. A limb of a tree about which…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Bates & Rogers Construction Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Grimes v. Stith Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- State ex rel. Niessen v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Morgan v. Butte Central Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920
- Markoff v. Emeralite Surfacing Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.