Legal Opinion
Markoff v. Emeralite Surfacing Products Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 26, 1934No. 29,645PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILTON, Justice.
Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission awarding compensation for injuries sustained by an employe.
Markoff worked for relator in its plant located three miles from the city of Ely on state highway No. 35. He lived on a farm near that highway two miles from the plant and between it and Ely. Relator regularly furnished transportation to its employes, including Markoff, to and from work by means of a truck owned by it.
On March i, 1932, after work at the plant had ceased, Markoff, together with other employes, was being transported homeward on the company truck.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nesbitt v. Twin City Forge & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Scott v. WillisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
- Flanagan v. Webster & WebsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Howes v. Stark Bros. Nurseries & Orchards Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- State ex rel. City of Northfield v. District Court of Rice CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ogren v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Rinne v. W. C. Griffis Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Radermacher v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Ward v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Povia Bros. Farms v. VelezSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.