Legal Opinion

Bates & Rogers Construction Co. v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 28, 1919PublishedCited by 57 opinions

Appeal from Mason Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Carroll

Affirming.

This case, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, is brought here by the employer, Bates & Rogers Construction Company, from the Mason circuit court, to which an appeal was prosecuted from the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board by the appellee, Henry Allen, who had been denied compensation by the board.

There is no dispute about the facts, which are substantially as follows: Henry Allen was in the employ of the appellant, Bates & Rogers Construction Company, at lock and dam No. 33, on the Ohio river, near Mays-ville, Kentucky,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Parker-Washington Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Murphy's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Schmidt v. O. K. Baking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  5. Joliet Motor Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. January-Wood Company v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. ArantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Kingston-Pocahontas Coal Company v. MaynardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. Williams Manufacturing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  5. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co. v. BarnhillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API