Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sorensen v. Citizens State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1933No. 28412PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

Three petitions in intervention to establish preferred claims against the assets of the insolvent Citizens State Bank of Wahoo, Nebraska, were consolidated and tried as one case. The trial court gave the interveners a preferred claim upon a $3,500 mortgage and $175 interest collected thereon, and gave claimants a general claim against the bank for $9,500. Two errors, set out in the brief of the appellants, are' that the judgment is contrary to the evidence, and contrary to the law.

There is no dispute about the facts in the case, for the parties entered into a long stipulation in reference…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beard v. Independent Dist. of Pella CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  2. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  3. First State Bank v. OelkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. State ex rel. Sorensen v. State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Morrison v. Lincoln Savings Bank & Safe Deposit Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Northern Bank v. Federal Deposit InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Bank of OtoeNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State ex rel. Good v. Platte Valley State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  4. In Re Columbus State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Torgeson v. Department of Trade & CommerceNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API