Legal Opinion

First State Bank v. Oelke

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 1910PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Hancoclc District Court. — Hon. J. J. Clark, Judge. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

This action was originally brought by the plaintiff Stilson to place the First State Bank of Cor-with in the hands of a receiver, and W. O. Oelke was later appointed receiver of said bank and duly qualified. The People’s Savings Bank of St. Benedict, G. W. Mason & Co., S. B. Baymond, Grundy County National Bank, and the Garnavillo Savings Bank filed claims against the First State Bank of Corwith, and subsequently asked that such claims be given preference over the claims of the general creditors of the bank and preference over the claims of depositors in said bank. W. -0. Oelke, as receiver…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Matter of Cavin v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Officer v. OfficerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Independent District v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  4. Smith v. Des Moines National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. Whitcomb v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Leach v. Iowa State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. Cable v. Iowa State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. Andrew v. State Bank of New HamptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Andrew v. Sac County State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Farnsworth v. Muscatine Produce & Pure Ice Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API