Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Sorensen v. Bank of Otoe
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1933No. 28603PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
The receiver of the insolvent Bank of Otoe has appealed from a judgment allowing to intervener, Bowles Live Stock Commission Company, a preferred claim against the bank.
The record discloses the following pertinent facts: E. W. Schütz desired to purchase from intervener a carload of cattle and arranged with one Hillman to borrow $1,200 to pay therefor. The president of the now insolvent bank was informed by Hillman and Schütz of this arrangement, and that Hillman would lend the amount to Schütz to pay for the cattle. Schütz purchased the cattle and tendered to intervener a check on the bank…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Empire State Surety Co. v. Carroll CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Hanover State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Beard v. Independent Dist. of Pella CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Blanchette v. Keith County Bank & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Glass v. Nebraska State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
- State ex rel. Good v. Platte Valley State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- State ex rel. Sorensen v. American State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Dockendorf v. Dakota County State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.