Legal Opinion
Deak-Perera Hawaii, Inc. v. Department of Transportation, State of Hawaii, and Citicorp (Usa), Inc., Intervenor-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 26, 1984No. 83-1552PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.
Deak-Perera lost its bid to retain the currency exchange concession at Honolulu International Airport when the Hawaii Department of Transportation awarded a five-year exclusive concession to Citicorp, the highest bidder. Alleging violation of federal and state antitrust laws and state bidding laws, Deak-Perera sued the state agency and two of its officials. We affirm the district court’s finding that the defendants were entitled to state action immunity from federal antitrust laws. Deak-Perera Hawaii, Inc. v. Department of Transportation, 553 F.Supp. 976 (D.Haw.1983).
I.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sanders v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Commuter Transportation Systems, Inc. v. Hillsborough County Aviation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Llewellyn v. CrothersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Actmedia, Inc. v. StrohCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.