Legal Opinion
Llewellyn v. Crothers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 8, 1985No. Nos. 83-4019, 83-4037PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs, licensed chiropractors in the State of Oregon, brought this action for damages and injunctive relief based on alleged antitrust, equal protection, and due process violations in the setting of fee guidelines and maximum fee schedules for chiropractic services under the Oregon Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act), Or. Rev.Stat. §§ 656.001-656.794 (1983). The principal issue in the case concerns the immunity of the defendants for implementing policies of the state, and, consequently, their identities and governmental capacities are significant. The individual…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Nugget Hydroelectric, L.P. v. Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- The Interface Group, Inc. v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Boone v. Redevelopment Agency of City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Hancock Industries v. SchaefferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.