Legal Opinion
Commuter Transportation Systems, Inc. v. Hillsborough County Aviation Authority
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 15, 1986No. 86-3226PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATKINS, Senior District Judge:
Hillsborough County Aviation Authority (The Authority) appeals from a denial of its motion for a summary judgment on the grounds that it is immune from antitrust attack under the state action doctrine of Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 63 S.Ct. 307, 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943) and immune from damage claims under the Local Government Antitrust Act of 1984 (15 U.S.C. § 34-36).
The Authority also urges that the denial of the summary judgment is immediately appealable as a “collateral order” under Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985) and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Diamond Crystal Brands, Inc. v. Food Movers International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- The Interface Group, Inc. v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Richard A. Bolt and Richard A. Bolt, M.D. v. Halifax Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Cottle v. Storer Communication, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Bankers Insurance v. Florida Residential Property & Casualty Joint Underwriting Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.