Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint asserts one claim under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-89 (“Public Accommodations and Services Operated by Private Entities”), against defendant Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc. (“Pier l”),1 along with several California state claims. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief under the ADA and monetary relief under the state claims.
The parties have cross-moved for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion for summary judgment (and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kirola v. City of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Gilkerson v. Chasewood BankDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- Kalani v. Starbucks Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- 1600 East Newlands Drive, LLC v. Amazon.com.NDVC, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
- Hernandez v. SyncrasyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023