Kalani v. Starbucks Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
*880ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. Nos. 75, 76
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge
Plaintiff Robert Kalani (“Plaintiff’ or “Kalani”) brings this action against Defendant Starbucks Corporation (“Defendant” or “Starbucks”) for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the record in this case, and the relevant law, the Court hereby grants in part and denies in part…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Crandall v. Starbucks Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Garcia v. DudumDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Garcia v. DudumDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Hernandez v. SyncrasyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Hillery v. Sun City Anthem Community Association IncDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.