Legal Opinion
Gilkerson v. Chasewood Bank
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided February 27, 2014No. Civil Action No. H-13-0132PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.
The above referenced putative class action under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(3) alleges that Defendant The Chasewood Bank (“Chasewood”) failed to make its automated teller machine (“ATM”), located at 8500 Cypresswood Drive, Spring, Texas 77379, accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals by adding required voice guidance and universal tactile key pads, inter alia, in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., its implementing regulations (28 C.F.R. §§…
2Cases cited94 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sabal Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank AGDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2016
- Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Smith v. Bd. of Commissioners of the La. StadiumDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2019
- Magee v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2015
- Arbella Rodriguez Marquez v. Eric Rokosky, Warden at Eloy Detention Center, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.