Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Nunes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1963PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the circuit court of Jackson county in a highway condemnation action to secure a right of way for highway purposes. Defendants had been in the business of selling topsoil, sand, and gravel from the property. The highway necessitated the taking of a part of the land. As a result of the taking plaintiff was deprived of access to a part of his land not taken. Plaintiff alleged that these parts had a value of $7,800. Defendants’ amended answer claimed the sum to be $37,250. The jury fixed the value at $24,500 and judgment was entered accordingly.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Indian Creek Marble Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1941
  3. City & County of Denver v. QuickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  4. Buckhannon & Northern Railroad v. Great Scott Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State Highway Commission v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1959

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Iske v. Metropolitan Utilities District of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Werner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. State Roads Commission v. CreswellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. State v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Maricopa County v. BarkleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API