Legal Opinion

Iske v. Metropolitan Utilities District of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1968No. 36558PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

This is a proceeding in eminent domain. The defendant, Metropolitan Utilities District of Omaha, which furnishes water service to the metropolitan area of Omaha, Nebraska, is constructing a well field adjacent to the Platte River south of Omaha. As a part of that project, the defendant condemned a 284-acre tract of land owned by the plaintiff, George Thomas Iske.

The Iske tract contains Cedar Island, which has an area of 173 acres and is approximately 1% miles in length, and river-bed land amounting to 111 acres. Cedar Island is separated from the north bank of the Platte River by a narrow…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. State v. OakleyTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Langdon v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State Highway Commission v. DealOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Wahlgren v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Clark v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Nebraska Nutrients, Inc. v. ShepherdNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Dash v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Fruit Growers Express Co. v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  4. Walkenhorst v. State, Department of RoadsNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Westgate Recreation Ass'n v. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API