Legal Opinion
Fedderson v. Goode
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 24, 1944No. 14,942PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as Fedderson, defendant in error as Goode, Carleton D. Beh and Carleton D.. Beh Company (which is Carleton D. Beh) as Beh, and the City and County of Denver as Denver.
Through the instrumentality of a duly enacted ordinance, Denver issued and sold to Beh certain refunding bonds approximating four million dollars, one-half of which Beh transferred to Goode, they having collaborated in the deal. Fedderson, claiming to have assisted them in the negotiation and consummation of the transaction, brought this suit against Goode for $8,750, being one-half…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commercial Lumber Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Heckman v. ManningSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
- Miller v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Beatty v. ReslerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
- Duncan v. CapehartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lowell Staats Mining Company, Inc. v. Philadelphia Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Taylor v. BrindleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Williams v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Colorado Performance Corp. v. Mariposa AssociatesColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
- Nelson v. Centennial Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.