Legal Opinion

Miller v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 3, 1927No. 11,575PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adawes

The names of the parties appear here in the same order as at the trial. We shall refer to Miller as plaintiff and to the bank as defendant, as there aligned.

The complaint contained three counts: First, to recover a balance claimed by plaintiff in an open checking account in defendant bank; second, for a balance that he claimed in his savings deposits, and third, for alleged conversion of a promissory note. At the close of the evidence, the court granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and plaintiff brings the case here for review.

The disputed amounts on the first two causes are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weston v. LivezeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gossard v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  2. Nelson v. Centennial Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  3. Fedderson v. GoodeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  4. Neal v. Wilson County BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Johansen v. SchuettigSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API