Legal Opinion
Taylor Woodrow Plc v. Blitman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 5, 1985No. 83 Civ. 6899 (LFM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves, pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment against defendant Howard N. Blitman.
In 1968, plaintiff Taylor Woodrow pic. owned 50% of the common stock of Blitman Construction Company (“BCC”), and defendants Charles and Howard Blitman owned the remaining 50% of BCC’s common stock. In November 1968, plaintiff provided a $1 million letter of credit to Travelers Indemnity Company (“Travelers”), issued by European American Banking Corporation (“EAB”), as security for performance bonds issued by Travelers on behalf of BCC. Shortly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burton M. Abrams and Marguerite M. Abrams v. Interco IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Modern Home Institute, Inc. And Romac Resources, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Feuer v. Menkes Feuer, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Stull v. BakerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- United States Printing & Lithograph Co. v. PowersNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holland v. Fahnestock & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. J. United Electrical Contracting Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- American Transtech Inc. v. U.S. Trust Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Carey Transportation, Inc. v. Greyhound Corp. (Carey Transportation, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1987