Legal Opinion
Stull v. Baker
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 27, 1976No. 69 Civ. 2046 and 73 Civ. 3600PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONNER, District Judge:
Presently before the Court is an application pursuant to Rules 23(e) and 23.1 F.R.Civ.P., for an order approving the settlement and dismissal of the individual, class action, and derivative claims set forth in the above-captioned actions. Also before the Court is a joint application by Stull, Stull & Brody, Esq., plaintiff's counsel in the Stull action, and their counterparts in the Darwish action, Milberg & Weiss, Esqs., for the award of attorneys’ fees.
I
BACKGROUND
The Stull Action
The Stull action was filed on May 12, 1969 by Richard J. Stull, a purchaser of common…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,484 John F. Maher v. Zapata Corporation v. William Maldonado, Objector-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Boyd v. Bechtel Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1979
- In Re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- In re Broadwing, Inc. Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.