Legal Opinion
Holland v. Fahnestock & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 15, 2002No. 01 CIV.2462(RMB)(AJP)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BERMAN, District Judge.
I. Background
On March 22, 2001, Plaintiffs Edward and Brian Holland and four (4) Delaware limited partnerships and corporations (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) commenced an action against Defendants Fahnestock & Co, Inc. (“Fahnes-tock”), David Pullman (“Pullman”), Mazuma Capital, Inc. (“Mazuma”), and Tom Ghyczy (“Ghyczy”) (collectively, “Defendants”) for alleged violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud and conversion, in connection with the structuring and sale of…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Reliant Energy Services, Inc. v. Enron Canada Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- City of New York v. Milhelm Attea & Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Mattera v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Williams v. BankOne, National Ass'n (In Re Williams)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.