Legal Opinion
Carey Transportation, Inc. v. Greyhound Corp. (Carey Transportation, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 15, 1987No. 19-22534PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BURTON R. LIFLAND, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. Introduction
Carey Transportation, Inc. (“Carey”) commenced an adversary proceeding against Greyhound Corporation (“Greyhound”) seeking an order directing Greyhound to indemnify Carey for a pro-rata portion of a settlement agreement, reached between Carey and the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority (“TBTA”). Carey alleges that indemnification is mandated by the terms of a contract which defines the rights and liabilities of Carey, Greyhound, and Carey’s current owner, the Schiavone Corporation…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Group of Institutional Investors v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P.R. Co., and 9 Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- American Home Products Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Johns-Manville Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- American Home Products Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Granite Partners, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Carey Transportation, Inc. v. Greyhound Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Unr Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Hughes Communications India Private Limited v. The DirecTV Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024