Legal Opinion
Friends of Yosemite Valley v. Norton
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 22, 2002No. CV. F00-6191 AWI DLBPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL
ISHII, District Judge.
In this action Friends of Yosemite Valley and Mariposans for Environmentally Responsible Growth (collectively “Plaintiffs”) challenge the June 2000 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan (“MRP”) and Final Environmental Impact Statement (“FEIS”), and the August 9, 2000 Record of Decision (“ROD”) implementing the MRP and the FEIS. Plaintiffs contend that Defendants have failed to prepare a valid comprehensive management plan that protects and enhances the natural values of the Merced…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Friends of Yosemite Valley v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Friends of Yosemite Valley v. ScarlettDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
- Friends Of Yosemite Valley v. Gale NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Watkins v. United Needs & Abilities, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021