Legal Opinion
Friends of Yosemite Valley v. Scarlett
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 19, 2006No. CV F 00-6191 AWI DLB. Docs. No. 271, 276PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ISHII, District Judge.
In 1987, Congress designated the Merced River in Yosemite National Park as a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Pub.L. 101-49, 101 Stat. 879, 16 U.S.C. § 1274(a)(62). Under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (“WSRA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1271 et seq, the National Park Service (“NPS”) was obligated to prepare a comprehensive management plan (“CMP”) for the Merced River within three fiscal years of its designation under WSRA. 16 U.S.C. § 1274(d). It did not do so.
In February of 1999, Mariposans for…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Friends of Yosemite Valley v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Oceana v. Bureau of Ocean Energy ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- League to Save Lake Tahoe v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Coalition to Preserve McIntire Park v. MendezDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2012
- Friends of Yosemite v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.