Legal Opinion
Day v. Pennsylvania Railroad
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 5, 1957No. Civ. No. 356-55PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, District Judge.
On April 11, 1955, Charles A. DePriest filed a. complaint in this court alleging that he had been employed as a locomotive engineer by the defendant, The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, from May 13,1918, until March 10, 1955, when he retired. He further alleged that on March 1, 1941, the defendant-railroad company and the Baltimore and Eastern Railroad Company, as employers, and the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, a labor union, had entered into an agreement for the benefit of locomotive engineers employed by the two railroads in both yard and road service, of which…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Order of Railway Conductors v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Kirby v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Sture v. Sigfred v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Reynolds v. Denver & Rio Grande Western R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- George M. Day, Administrator Ad Litem of the Estate of Charles A. De Priest v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Stranford v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
- Finlin v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1960
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1959