Legal Opinion
George M. Day, Administrator Ad Litem of the Estate of Charles A. De Priest v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 10, 1958No. 12462PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
The substituted plaintiff appeals from an Order entered against him in the District Court dismissing the complaint originally filed by his decedent.
Details of the action, proceedings, and contentions of the parties are set forth in prior opinions of the District Court and this Court 1 as well as in 155 F. Supp. 695, which immediately preceded this appeal.
Briefly stated, Charles A. DePriest commenced this action for damages against the defendant railroad asserting that pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement, and during his employment by the defendant railroad as…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Washington Terminal Co. v. BoswellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- McManaman v. ElginAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
- Finlin v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1960
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1959