Legal Opinion
Finlin v. Pennsylvania Railroad
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 3, 1960No. Civ. No. 431-57PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, District Judge.
On May 18, 1951, plaintiffs Finlin, Hogentogler and Middleton filed an amended complaint in this Court, in Civil Action 457-51, joining one Arthur F. Naylor as parties plaintiff. Naylor had previously filed a complaint on May 4, 1951 against the defendant, Pennsylvania Railroad Company, for an accounting and damages arising out of an alleged breach of a collective bargaining agreement. The claim concerned his operation of defendant’s locomotives over track of other railroad companies. The plaintiffs also sought to restrain defendant from effecting a settlement of such…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blackmar v. GuerreSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Union Pacific Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Washington Terminal Co. v. BoswellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thomas J. Finlin, Charles H. Hogentogler and Darrell L. Middleton v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961