Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Day
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 12, 1959No. 397PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ivjlr. justice PKANJKr unjin
delivered the opinion of the Court.
In April 1955 Charles A. DePriest began an action in the District Court for the District of New Jersey, claiming $27,000 in additional compensation from the Pennsylvania Railroad. DePriest .had been employed as a locomotive engineer by the Railroad from May 1918 to March 1955, at which time he resigned his employment and applied for an annuity. He alleged that under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement between the Railroad *549and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers of which he was a member, he was entitled to an extra day’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ballew v. Continental Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Austin Lakes Joint Venture v. Avon Utilities, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Air Line Pilots Association, International, Cross v. United Air Lines, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.