Order of Railway Conductors v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
This case raises the same statutory question as Slocum v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., ante, p. 239, The petitioner, Order of Railway Conductors, is the only accredited bargaining representative of conductors employed by the re spondent Southern Railway. A dispute arose between certain conductors and the railroad concerning the railroad’s obligation under the collective-bargaining agreement to give conductors extra pay for certain services. The claims of the conductors were referred to the union, which sought by negotiation to persuade the railroad to pay. The railroad refused, and thereafter…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Southern Ry. Co. v. Order of Ry. Conductors of AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
3Cited by97 opinions
- Transportation-Communication Employees Union v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Ferro v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Derlyn E. Moe v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.