Legal Opinion

Cavanaugh & McCaffrey, Inc. v. Barnard

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 28, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

Assuming that the court impliedly found that the plaintiff’s direction to ship the lumber and submit to it (the plaintiff) the full, account, coupled with the subsequent examination of the account, and the statement: “We will try and get together and settle up,” constituted an attempt to compromise rather than an admission of liability (Masterson v. Railway, ante, 190, 193), it is difficult to understand how that finding could fairly be made without the detailed testimony of the parties. And according to the record no oral testimony whatever was admitted.

In Bartlett v. Hoyt, 33 N. H. 151, it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Colburn v. GrotonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
  2. Hughes v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
  3. Bechard v. AmeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  4. Jenness v. JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1896
  5. Smith v. MorrillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hays v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Gagne v. New Haven Road Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  3. State v. HaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  4. State v. LongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  5. Southeast Portland Lumber Co. v. CoreyOregon Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API