Legal Opinion

State v. Hale

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 1, 1932PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The various counts on which verdicts of guilty were returned relate to separate mortgage-loans, all embraced in a comprehensive transaction involving the development of land in Colorado. Although the record is extremely voluminous, the evidence pertinent to the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict may be briefly summarized.

On September 16, 1925, one Charles E. Gibson, through whose real estate agency loans aggregating substantially a million dollars had been made by the Merrimack River Savings Bank on land situated in or near the San Luis valley, wrote a personal letter to the defendant…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. DodgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  2. State v. MannionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  3. Piateck v. SwindellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  4. State v. WrenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  5. Sanders v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PalumboSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  2. Petition of DusablonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  3. State v. ThorpSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  4. Raymond J. Pittman v. Harold A. Littlefield, E. Kenneth Littlefield, Edith L. Howard, D/B/A Littlefield Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  5. Campbell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API