Southeast Portland Lumber Co. v. Corey
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
It appears that during the time of operation under the contract in 1931, both parties had a representative to scale the logs delivered at the mill pond. There is no disagreement in regard to the scale during that year, but there is controversy over the computation of the number of feet in logs of 42 feet and over in length. During the time of operating in 1932 Corey asserts that he was unable to have a representative at the mill pond, and had the same man, W. H. Pearce, who sealed for him at the mill pond during 1931, scale the logs at a service station on the route to the mill.
At the trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pippy v. WinslowOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Sweeney v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Hot Springs Ry. Co. v. MaherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Robson v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- City Messenger Co. v. Postal Telegraph Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Land Board v. Portland Trust & Savings BankOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- Jarrett v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989