Legal Opinion

State v. Long

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 16, 1939No. 3058PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Although no definite time for the filing of a bill of exceptions was fixed by the Presiding Justice or any request therefor made by the State, the strategy of defendant's counsel in delaying action until a stay of execution was imperative cannot be commended. It is unnecessary, however, to consider counsel's contention that their bill of exceptions was seasonably filed within the meaning of Rule 66 of the Superior Court (78 N.H. 688, 699).

The so-called confessions (two in number) were admitted in evidence "as tending to show" that the defendant "caused the death of Mark Neville Jensen." But…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. PikeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1870
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1870
  3. State v. WrenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  4. Watkins v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  5. A. Perley Fitch Co. v. Phoenix InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Novosel v. HelgemoeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. State v. InselburgSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. Robert Breest v. Everett I. Perrin, Jr., Warden, New Hampshire State Prison, Frederick J. Martineau v. Richard T. McCarthy Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  4. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Timmons v. PeytonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API