Legal Opinion

Bechard v. Amey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 7, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The defendant at the trial asserted and reasserted in various ways his position that the plaintiff’s rights were strictly limited by the terms of the written contract. This contention was the basis of exceptions to evidence, of motions for a nonsuit and a directed verdict, of requests to charge the jury and of the motion to set aside the verdict. A decision upon the fundamental question thus presented will therefore go far toward disposing of the numerous exceptions which appear in the recor’d.

The defendant contracted to pay the plaintiff for cutting and hauling the logs on a certain lot at…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frank B. Abbadessa v. Moore Business Forms, Inc., Robert D. Mariotti v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Shafmaster v. ShafmasterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  3. Billings v. Missoula White Pine Sash Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Cavanaugh & McCaffrey, Inc. v. BarnardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  5. Plymouth Village Fire District v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API