Legal Opinion
R. Zemper & Associates v. Scozzafava
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 11, 1992No. 10814PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff brought this action for breach of contract and quantum meruit for fees due it because it proffered a ready, willing and able buyer to the defendant, who then refused to complete the transaction. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly found that the plaintiff failed to meet its burden of proof that the purchaser was financially able to complete the proposed transaction. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found the following facts. On…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. CofieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Carothers v. CapozzielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Lester v. Resort Camplands International, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Przekopski v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- McCook v. CoutuConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Jaramillo v. CaseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Oakhill Associates v. D'AmatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- William Raveis Real Estate, Inc. v. StawskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.