Legal Opinion
Oakhill Associates v. D'Amato
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 16, 1993No. 11098PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The plaintiff partnership, Oakhill Associates, appeals from the judgment rendered, after a trial to the court, for the defendant Edward A. *357D’Amato, Sr. (D’Amato), a member of the partnership, and the defendant D’Amato Construction Company. Oakhill’s four count complaint alleged a breach of contract, negligence, a breach of fiduciary duty and a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., all arising out of a claim that the defendants charged excessive and unreasonable amounts for site development work performed for Oakhill. The trial court found…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Evans v. SantoroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- R. Zemper & Associates v. ScozzafavaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Konover Development Corp. v. ZellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Oakhill Associates v. D'AmatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Mitchell v. MitchellConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Oakhill Associates v. D'AmatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993