Legal Opinion

Maclean-Fogg Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 13, 2012No. Consol. 11-00209PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

POGUE, Chief Judge:

In prior proceedings in this matter, joint Plaintiffs, four domestic importers and one exporter of extruded aluminum, challenged the 374.15% all-others countervailing duty (“CVD”) rate set by the Department of Commerce (“the Department” or “Commerce”) in its investigation of their goods imported from the People’s Republic of China. The court held that the Department’s applicable regulation was permitted by ambiguity in the statute governing the all-others rate, but it also found the rate unreasonable and remanded it to Commerce for reconsideration.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Target Stores, Div. of Target Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  2. Usec, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  3. Maclean-Fogg Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MacLean-Fogg Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
  2. MacLean-fogg Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  3. MacLean-Fogg Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
  4. Capella Sales & Services Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
  5. Snap-on, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API