McGrath v. Pennsylvania Sugar Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Sadler,
The Pennsylvania Sugar Company, defendant, is engaged in the business of refining sugar for others who forward the raw product to it. A pier is used in connection with the plant where the finished and unfinished material is handled, under the general supervision of defendant’s employees. Stevedores are obtained under contract with firms which make a business of supplying this character of labor, and the actual movements of material to and from the dock are carried on by them. On the day of the accident, which gave rise to the present litigation, Loveland & Co.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Washington v. W. C. Dawson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Simonton v. MortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Scalise v. F. M. Venzie Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- American Export Lines, Inc. v. RevelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- Gallivan v. Wark Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.