Legal Opinion
Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 2009No. B212761PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLIER, J.
The plaintiffs, real parties in interest in the proceedings before us, H. Roger Wang and Vivine Wang (from time to time collectively referred to as the Wangs), sued petitioner Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., over charges added to the price of shore excursions taken during a cruise conducted by petitioner. The Wangs asserted five causes of action. The first three were based on Business and Professions Code sections 17200 (first cause of action) and 17500 (second) and on Civil Code section 1750 et seq. (third). Respectively, these statutes are California’s unfair competition law…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Hall v. Time Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Consumer Advocates v. Echostar Satellite Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Boris v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Beasley v. Conagra Brands, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- In Re Neurontin Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Vitug v. ALAMEDA POINT STORAGE, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Akes v. Beiersdorf, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.