Legal Opinion

Beasley v. Conagra Brands, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 18, 2019No. Case No. 18-cv-06730-SIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUSAN ILLSTON, United States District Judge

Now before the Court is a motion by defendant Conagra Brands, Inc. ("Conagra") to dismiss plaintiff Mark Beasley's first amended class action complaint. Docket No. 30 ("Mot."). The motion is scheduled for hearing on March 22, 2019. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument, and hereby VACATES the hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS defendant's motion to dismiss, with and without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6).

BACKGR…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beasley v. Lucky Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  2. Belyea v. GreenSky, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
  3. CILLUFFO v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
  4. Chu v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  5. GOODMAN v. INTERVET, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API