Chase v. Super-Cold Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from a £< judgment of dis missal” due to the failure of plaintiffs to comply with an order requiring plaintiffs to furnish security for the reasonable expenses which might be incurred by the defendants in said action, pursuant to section 834, Corporations Code. The plaintiffs, as shareholders of The Super-Cold Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Super-Cold) instituted a derivative action against Super-Cold; Nicholas A. Kessler, an officer and director of Super-Cold; U.S. Industrial Tool Company, a corporation substantially owned by Kessler; Frederick R. Waingrow, an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beyerbach v. Juno Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Melancon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Olson v. Basin Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Crespinel v. Color Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burt v. Irvine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Woodman v. AckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Bailey v. Fosca Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- DONNER MANAGEMENT CO. v. SchafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Armstrong Manors v. BurrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.