Legal Opinion

Worth v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1987No. 86-450PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatton, J.

Although the appellant-executives have raised several propositions of law, the central issue presented in this case is whether the courts below erred in concluding that the enforcement clause of appellants’ Employment Agreements was void as against Ohio’s public policy. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that such clauses are enforceable and are not contrary to Ohio’s public policy.

Union Commerce entered into Employment Agreements with the appellants in an effort to retain their services as two key executives pending a possible change of control. Section 5 of the Employment Agreements,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. TrowbridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Allen v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Glaspell v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Kendall v. U.S. Dismantling Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Bell v. DimmerlingOhio Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Wilborn v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Vicki Linneman v. Vita-Mix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. Hanlin Group, Inc. v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1990
  4. International Lottery, Inc. v. KerouacOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Ayers v. Cleveland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API