Glaspell v. Ohio Edison Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The precise issues for determination are whether the indemnity agreement before the court is violative of public policy and, if not, whether its terms encompass the injury complained of. For the reasons expressed within, we find that the agreement is enforceable among the parties.
United Telephone granted Cablevision a license which, among other acts, permitted appellee to install equipment upon and make use of appellants’ utility poles for the purpose of transmitting cable television signals to Cablevision’s subscribers. The agreement also provided, in pertinent part:
“8. Indemnity to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Allen v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Kendall v. U.S. Dismantling Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Ledex, Inc. v. Heatbath Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by59 opinions
- Worth v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Corporate Circle, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Swartzentruber v. Wee-K Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Aero Fulfillment Services Corp. v. Oracle Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.