Legal Opinion

Kendall v. U.S. Dismantling Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1985No. 84-1776PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.

I

The first issue presented in this appeal is whether R.C. 2305.31 prohibits only those indemnity agreements in construction-related contracts whereby the promisor agrees to indemnify the promisee for damages caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of the promisee. We hold that this statute applies to such agreements regardless of whether the negligence is sole or concurrent.

R.C. 2305.31 provides in pertinent part:

“A covenant, promise, agreement, or understanding in, or in connection with or collateral to, a contract or agreement relative to the design, planning, construction,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Goodman v. BeallOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Davis v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. LenartIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Worth v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Glaspell v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Goodyear Tire v. J.M. Tull MetalsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Davis v. Ltv Steel Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API