Legal Opinion
International Lottery, Inc. v. Kerouac
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 26, 1995No. C-930920PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Judge.
The defendant-appellant, Armand R. Kerouac, Jr., appeals from the trial court’s order of November 17, 1993, which overruled his motion for relief from the judgment entered against him on March 4, 1993. 1 In his two assignments of error, Kerouac contends that (1) the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, and (2) the trial court abused its discretion by overruling his motion for relief from judgment under Civ.R. 60(B). For the reasons set forth below, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed with respect to the award of attorney fees.
On June 26,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Burns v. DailyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Health for Life Brands, Inc. v. PowleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Payton v. RehbergOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Cincinnati v. HarrisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Miley v. STS Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.