Legal Opinion

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Trowbridge

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1975No. 74-10PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, J.

Although appellant has raised four propositions of law, the basic issue is whether a tortfeasor responding in damages resulting from the negligent treatment by a physician of the original injury caused by the negligence of the tortfeasor has a right to indemnity from such physician for that portion of the damages due directly to the negligence of the physician.

Neither party herein contests the correctness or ap plicability of the holding in Tanner v. Espey (1934), 128 Ohio St. 82, that the negligence of a tortfeasor in causing the original injury is the proximate cause of damages flowing from…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bello v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Globe Indemnity Co. v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Taylor v. WebsterOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Mouse v. Central Savings & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Frederick Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Comer v. RiskoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Worth v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. R. & G. Orthopedic Appliances & Prosthetics, Inc. v. CurtinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. Pretty Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
  5. Motorists Mutual Insurance v. Huron Road HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1995

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API