Legal Opinion
In re Disciplinary Action Against Tigue
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 12, 2014No. A13-0519PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent Randall D. B. Tigue. Following an eviden-tiary hearing, the referee found that Tigue failed to maintain trust account books and records, failed to retain trust account bank records for the required period of time, and negligently misappropriated client funds. The referee recommended a public reprimand and 3 years of supervised probation. The Director challenges the referee’s recommended discipline, arguing that Tigue should be indefinitely suspended for a…
3Cases cited23 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against TigueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In Re PETITION FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Frank Arend SCHULTE, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 244934Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mpatanishi Syanaloli TAYARI-GARRETT, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 342075Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Robert D. STONEBURNER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0105909Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- In re KlotzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.