Schick v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
There are two questions presented by this record: First, does the failure of the city to begin proceedings to adjudicate the claims for damages of the plaintiffs in error within ten days after the completion of the improvement invalidate the right of the city to collect the assessments in question? Second, are Sections 4227-2 and 4227-3, General Code, in conflict with Section If, Article II, of the Constitution of Ohio?
It is the claim of the plaintiffs in error that there has been such a violation of Section 3829, General Code, that the city has lost its right to collect the assessments in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pond v. NegusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. BarnellOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- St. Louis County Court v. SparksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1846
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- People ex rel. Bd. of Supervisors of Solano Cty. v. Bd. of Supervisors of Lake Cty.California Supreme Court · 1867
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. Dudas, 2008-L-109 (3-6-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. TribbleOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Boggs v. Ohio Real Estate CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Horse Creek Conservation District v. Lincoln Land Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Estate of Niemi v. Niemi, 2008-T-0082 (5-1-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.