Legal Opinion
State v. Dudas, 2008-L-109 (3-6-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 6, 2009No. Nos. 2008-L-109 and 2008-L-110PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIUM OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant, Ronald Dudas, appeals the judgment of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion to quash the indictment. Appellant was convicted following his guilty plea to intimidation of and retaliation against a Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Judge and engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity involving the theft of money and real estate from numerous victims. At issue is whether appellant's motion was barred by res judicata and his guilty plea. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
{¶ 2} Appellant pled guilty in two cases that were consolidated in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Haring v. ProsiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. Dent (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. MirandaOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Beverly (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. MontoyaOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.