Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Barnell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1924No. 17986PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Under the charter of the city of Zanesville, and subject to the civil service rules, can the safety director -of that municipality inquire into and render judgment on charges against a suspended employe of the fire department, after a period of five days has elapsed from the time he received notice of such charges, or does the fact that he has not inquired into and rendered judgment on the charges within the five-day period deprive him of jurisdiction thereafter to act in the case? This is the principal question here before us.

The ¡Court of Appeals, in refusing the peremptory writ of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dishon v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  2. Pond v. NegusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  3. Hurford v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Schario v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Spencer's Appeal From Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jones v. FarrarOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State ex rel. Larkins v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Alfred E. Kahn, Chairman, Council on Wage and Price StabilityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  4. City of Wauwatosa v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In re DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1999

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API